GeForce GTX 960M vs Tesla C2070
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 960M and Tesla C2070. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 960M and Tesla C2070. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GTX 960M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 960M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 960M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 960M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 217% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 960M.
- GeForce GTX 960M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 960M.
- GeForce GTX 960M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 960M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960M is 522 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 960M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 488 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 1% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| GeForce GTX 960M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Fortnite is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| GeForce GTX 960M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTX 960M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 960M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | N16P-GX | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1202 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 47.04 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,505 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 175 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |