FirePro S7150 vs GeForce GTX 965M
When choosing between FirePro S7150 and GeForce GTX 965M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7150 and GeForce GTX 965M.
FirePro S7150
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 965M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 965M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7150 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 965M.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 965M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 965M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 24 MHz higher, than FirePro S7150.
- FirePro S7150 and GeForce GTX 965M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 2500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7150 and GeForce GTX 965M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S7150 and GeForce GTX 965M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 965M | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Tonga | N16E-GS, N16E-GR |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 5 January 2015 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 944 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 2,940 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 73.60 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 2,355 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |