FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 965M
In this comparison between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 965M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9270 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 965M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 965M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 965M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 965M has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 965M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 965M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 194 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 965M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 1100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 215% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 78% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 237% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 171% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 184% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 134% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 35% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 169% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 190% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 230% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 965M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
Code name | RV770 | N16E-GS, N16E-GR |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 5 January 2015 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 944 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 2,940 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 73.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 2,355 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |