GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 965M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 965M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 280 stacks up against GeForce GTX 965M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 280
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 965M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 965M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 965M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 965M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 965M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 352 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 965M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 1393 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 366% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 132% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 237% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 380% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 471% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 965M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GT200 | N16E-GS, N16E-GR |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 5 January 2015 |
Pipelines | 240 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 944 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,940 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 73.60 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 2,355 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1 |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 240 | 1024 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |