GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 965M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 965M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 965M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 965M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 965M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 965M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 965M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 965M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 298 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 965M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 1501 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 186% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 170% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 965M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GT200B | N16E-GS, N16E-GR |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 5 January 2015 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 944 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,940 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 73.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 2,355 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| G-SYNC support | + | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1 |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 480 | 1024 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | + |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |