GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs GeForce GTX 965M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 768MB and GeForce GTX 965M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 768MB and GeForce GTX 965M.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 768MB | GeForce GTX 965M | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 965M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB is build with Fermi architecture, and GeForce GTX 965M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 269 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 700 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 768MB | GeForce GTX 965M | |
Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
Code name | N16E-GS, N16E-GR | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | no data | 5 January 2015 |
Pipelines | 336 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 944 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
Texture fill rate | 73.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 11 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | 1.1 | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs FireStream 9370
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 965M vs FireStream 9370
- GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Radeon HD 8970M
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Radeon HD 6930
- GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 8970M
- GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 6930