GeForce GTX 965M vs GRID M60 1Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 965M and GRID M60 1Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 965M and GRID M60 1Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M60 1Q
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 965M | GRID M60 1Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID M60 1Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 965M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 1Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID M60 1Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 387 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GeForce GTX 965M and GRID M60 1Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 2512 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and GRID M60 1Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 100−105 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and GRID M60 1Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and GRID M60 1Q have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and GRID M60 1Q have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 965M | GRID M60 1Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N16E-GS, N16E-GR | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 944 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.60 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| G-SYNC support | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.2 |
| CUDA cores | 1024 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |