GeForce GTX 965M vs GRID M60 2Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 965M and GRID M60 2Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 965M will be the best choice, for others GRID M60 2Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 2Q
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 965M | GRID M60 2Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID M60 2Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 965M has 2 GB more memory, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 2Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID M60 2Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 387 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GeForce GTX 965M and GRID M60 2Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 2512 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 965M and GRID M60 2Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 965M and GRID M60 2Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 965M | GRID M60 2Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N16E-GS, N16E-GR | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 January 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 944 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 73.60 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |