GeForce GTX 965M vs P104 100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 965M and P104 100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 965M stacks up against P104 100, check out specs charts below.
P104 100
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 965M | P104 100 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and P104 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 965M and P104 100 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and P104 100 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and P104 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 663 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
- GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P104 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P104 100 is 7508 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and P104 100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and P104 100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 965M | P104 100 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Code name | N16E-GS, N16E-GR | GP104 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 12 December 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 944 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | 1733 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.60 | 208.0 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 320.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| G-SYNC support | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | 6.1 |
| CUDA cores | 1024 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |