GeForce GTX 965M vs Quadro CX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro CX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro CX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro CX
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 965M | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1532 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 965M.
- GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 342 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 900 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 460% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 528% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 146% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 121% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 293% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 462% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 1100% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 700% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 965M | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N16E-GS, N16E-GR | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 January 2015 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 944 MHz | 602 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 73.60 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 1.3 |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 8970M
- GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 6930
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 8970M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 6930
- GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce GT 645M
- GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics