GeForce GTX 965M vs Quadro FX 3800
When choosing between GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro FX 3800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro FX 3800.
Quadro FX 3800
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 965M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 965M has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 344 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 900 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 1000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 178% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 148% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 1066% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 326% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 650% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 284% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 4100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1750% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1533% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 85% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 965M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N16E-GS, N16E-GR | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 January 2015 | 30 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 944 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 73.60 | 38.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 1.3 |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |