GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon Pro SSG

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon Pro SSG you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 965M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro SSG will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 965M Radeon Pro SSG
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt
Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type GDDR5 HBM2
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Display Connectors No outputs 6x mini-DisplayPort
  Check Price
  • GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro SSG uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
  • Radeon Pro SSG has 12 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 965M.
  • GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro SSG - in Desktops.
  • GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro SSG - with GCN 5.0.
  • Core clock speed of Radeon Pro SSG is 496 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
  • GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro SSG - by 14 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 610 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro SSG.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 20−22 50−55
ultra / 1080p 12−14 35−40
QHD / 1440p 6−7 27−30
4K / 2160p 5−6 16−18
low / 720p 35−40 80−85
medium / 1080p 24−27 60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 965M.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 965M Radeon Pro SSG
Architecture Maxwell GCN 5.0
Code name N16E-GS, N16E-GR Vega 10
Type Laptop Workstation
Release date 5 January 2015 8 August 2017
Pipelines 1024 4096
Core clock speed 944 MHz 1440 MHz
Boost Clock 950 / 1151 MHz 1500 MHz
Transistor count 2,940 million 12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Texture fill rate 73.60 384.0
Floating-point performance 2,355 gflops 12,288 gflops
Length 267 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit 2048 Bit
Memory clock speed 2500 MHz 1890 MHz
Memory bandwidth 80 GB/s 483.8 GB/s
Shared memory -
G-SYNC support +
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (12_1)
Shader Model 6.4 6.4
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
OpenCL 1.1 2.0
Vulkan 1.1 1.1.125
CUDA +
CUDA cores 1024
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
SLI options +
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 226 Mh/s
Laptop size large
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support +
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder +
Optimus +
GameStream +
GeForce ShadowPlay +
GPU Boost 2.0
GameWorks +
BatteryBoost +
  Check Price