GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon R7 M350
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon R7 M350. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon R7 M350. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M350
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 965M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon R7 M350 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 219 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
- GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 1500 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 366% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 237% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 380% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 471% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon R7 M350. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 965M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N16E-GS, N16E-GR | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 January 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 944 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 73.60 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1 | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |