GeForce GTX 965M vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 965M and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 965M stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 965M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 965M.
- GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 370 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 632 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 272% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 157% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 145% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 380% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 965M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | N16E-GS, N16E-GR | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 944 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| G-SYNC support | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| CUDA cores | 1024 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |