GeForce GTX 965M vs Tesla M6
When choosing between GeForce GTX 965M and Tesla M6, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 965M and Tesla M6.
Tesla M6
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 965M | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 965M.
- GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 14 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
- GeForce GTX 965M and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 2512 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 74% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 103% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 965M | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N16E-GS, N16E-GR | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 944 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.60 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| G-SYNC support | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.2 |
| CUDA cores | 1024 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |