FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 970M
When choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 970M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 970M.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GTX 970M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 970M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 970M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 970M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 970M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 970M has 5 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 970M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 970M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 970M is 234 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 970M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 1500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 970M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 412% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 149% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Dota 2 is 109% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Fortnite is 292% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Grand Theft Auto V is 232% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Minecraft is 41% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 119% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 344% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 461% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in World of Tanks is 45% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 970M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
Code name | Juniper | GM204 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 7 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 924 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 83.04 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 2,657 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 120 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 314 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |