GeForce GTX 970M vs Quadro FX 3800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 970M and Quadro FX 3800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 970M and Quadro FX 3800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 3800
GeForce GTX 970M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 970M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 970M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 970M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 970M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 970M has 5 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 970M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 970M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 970M is 324 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 970M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 970M is 900 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 970M and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 970M and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Dota 2 is 180% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Far Cry 5 is 1866% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Fortnite is 552% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Forza Horizon 4 is 1200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Grand Theft Auto V is 468% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Metro Exodus is 6600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 970M in World of Tanks is 97% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 970M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 7 October 2014 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 924 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 83.04 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,657 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 120 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| G-SYNC support | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
| CUDA cores | 1280 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 314 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |