FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 980M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 980M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 980M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 980M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 980M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 980M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 980M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 980M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 980M has 6 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 980M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 980M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 980M is 288 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 980M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 1100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 980M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 533% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Battlefield 5 is 461% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Dota 2 is 101% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Far Cry 5 is 525% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Fortnite is 346% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Forza Horizon 4 is 423% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Grand Theft Auto V is 269% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Minecraft is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 450% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 570% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in World of Tanks is 52% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 980M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
Code name | RV770 | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 7 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1127 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 51.84 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 3,462 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |