GeForce 840A vs GeForce GTX 980M
In this comparison between GeForce 840A and GeForce GTX 980M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 840A will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 980M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 840A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 980M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 980M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 980M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 840A | GeForce GTX 980M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 840A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 980M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 980M has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce 840A.
- GeForce 840A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 980M - in Laptops.
- GeForce 840A and GeForce GTX 980M are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 980M is 9 MHz higher, than GeForce 840A.
- GeForce 840A and GeForce GTX 980M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 980M is 498 MHz higher, than GeForce 840A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 616% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Battlefield 5 is 609% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 840A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 980M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Far Cry 5 is 628% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Fortnite is 386% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Forza Horizon 4 is 591% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Grand Theft Auto V is 325% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Metro Exodus is 900% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 450% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 690% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce 840A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 840A | GeForce GTX 980M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Code name | GM108 | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 7 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1127 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 51.84 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 3,462 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | + |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |