GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK stacks up against Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire, check out specs charts below.
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Power consumption (TDP)
250 Watt
200 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
One 8-pin and one 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK has 25% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire - with GCN.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK is 39 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is 4793 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
45−50
35−40
ultra / 1080p
30−35
24−27
QHD / 1440p
24−27
18−20
4K / 2160p
12−14
10−11
low / 720p
70−75
60−65
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 24% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
high / 1080p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
60−65
50−55
QHD / 1440p
45−50
35−40
4K / 2160p
24−27
18−20
low / 720p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
80−85
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
40−45
0−1
GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
250−260
medium / 768p
230−240
220−230
ultra / 1080p
210−220
180−190
QHD / 1440p
150−160
110−120
4K / 2160p
100−110
70−75
high / 768p
220−230
210−220
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
110−120
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
high / 1080p
55−60
45−50
ultra / 1080p
55−60
45−50
QHD / 1440p
35−40
30−33
4K / 2160p
20−22
16−18
low / 720p
95−100
85−90
medium / 1080p
60−65
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK in Far Cry 5 is 17% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
high / 1080p
80−85
60−65
ultra / 1080p
65−70
50−55
QHD / 1440p
40−45
30−33
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
low / 720p
210−220
180−190
medium / 1080p
130−140
120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK in Fortnite is 18% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
high / 1080p
75−80
60−65
ultra / 1080p
60−65
45−50
QHD / 1440p
45−50
30−35
4K / 2160p
30−35
24−27
low / 720p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
85−90
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
low / 768p
150−160
140−150
medium / 768p
140−150
130−140
high / 1080p
90−95
75−80
ultra / 1080p
40−45
30−35
QHD / 1440p
30−35
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
high / 1080p
30−35
24−27
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
21−24
18−20
4K / 2160p
12−14
9−10
low / 720p
85−90
70−75
medium / 1080p
45−50
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK in Metro Exodus is 22% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
low / 768p
130−140
130−140
medium / 1080p
130−140
120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK in Minecraft is 3% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
120−130
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
high / 1080p
30−35
24−27
ultra / 1080p
21−24
16−18
QHD / 1440p
16−18
10−12
4K / 2160p
10−12
8−9
low / 720p
85−90
70−75
medium / 1080p
45−50
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 28% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
low / 768p
170−180
130−140
medium / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
35−40
27−30
4K / 2160p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
55−60
GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Architecture
Kepler
GCN
Code name
GK110B
Neptune CF
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
18 February 2014
1 May 2012
Pipelines
2880
2560
Core clock speed
889 MHz
850 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
900 MHz
Transistor count
7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
213 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
5,645 gflops
Length
10.5" (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
384 Bit
2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed
7.0 GB/s
4800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
336 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
DirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
2880
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
303 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Blu Ray 3D
+
Check Price
Check Price