GeForce GTX TITAN vs Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
When comparing GeForce GTX TITAN and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX TITAN and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX TITAN
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
Power consumption (TDP)
250 Watt
60 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
One 8-pin and one 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX TITAN has 316% more power consumption, than Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTX TITAN and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q have maximum RAM of 6 GB.
GeForce GTX TITAN is used in Desktops, and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX TITAN is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q - with Turing.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX TITAN is 237 MHz higher, than Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q.
GeForce GTX TITAN is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q is 13994 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX TITAN.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
40−45
40−45
ultra / 1080p
27−30
27−30
QHD / 1440p
21−24
21−24
4K / 2160p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
70−75
65−70
medium / 1080p
50−55
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2% more, than Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q.
high / 1080p
65−70
65−70
ultra / 1080p
60−65
60−65
QHD / 1440p
45−50
40−45
4K / 2160p
24−27
21−24
low / 720p
120−130
120−130
medium / 1080p
75−80
75−80
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in Battlefield 5 is 1% more, than Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
30−33
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in Call of Duty: Warzone is 13% more, than Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q.
low / 768p
250−260
250−260
medium / 768p
230−240
230−240
ultra / 1080p
200−210
200−210
QHD / 1440p
150−160
140−150
4K / 2160p
100−110
95−100
high / 768p
220−230
220−230
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX TITAN and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
100−110
GeForce GTX TITAN and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
35−40
35−40
4K / 2160p
18−20
18−20
low / 720p
90−95
90−95
medium / 1080p
60−65
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in Far Cry 5 is 1% more, than Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q.
high / 1080p
75−80
75−80
ultra / 1080p
60−65
55−60
QHD / 1440p
35−40
35−40
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
low / 720p
200−210
200−210
medium / 1080p
130−140
130−140
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in Fortnite is 1% more, than Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q.
high / 1080p
75−80
70−75
ultra / 1080p
55−60
55−60
QHD / 1440p
40−45
40−45
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
low / 720p
120−130
120−130
medium / 1080p
80−85
75−80
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in Forza Horizon 4 is 2% more, than Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q.
low / 768p
150−160
150−160
medium / 768p
140−150
140−150
high / 1080p
85−90
85−90
ultra / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
30−35
30−33
GeForce GTX TITAN and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p
30−35
30−35
ultra / 1080p
27−30
24−27
QHD / 1440p
21−24
20−22
4K / 2160p
12−14
10−12
low / 720p
80−85
80−85
medium / 1080p
40−45
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in Metro Exodus is 2% more, than Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q.
low / 768p
130−140
130−140
medium / 1080p
130−140
130−140
GeForce GTX TITAN and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
110−120
110−120
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
GeForce GTX TITAN and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
30−35
30−35
ultra / 1080p
20−22
20−22
QHD / 1440p
14−16
14−16
4K / 2160p
10−11
10−11
low / 720p
80−85
80−85
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
GeForce GTX TITAN and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p
160−170
150−160
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
high / 1080p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
30−35
4K / 2160p
21−24
20−22
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 4% more, than Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
60−65
60−65
GeForce GTX TITAN and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX TITAN
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
Architecture
Kepler
Turing
Code name
GK110
N19E-Q1 MAX-Q
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
19 February 2013
27 May 2019
Pipelines
2688
1920
Core clock speed
837 MHz
600 - 870 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1215 - 1380 MHz
Transistor count
7,080 million
10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
12 nm
Texture fill rate
187.5 billion/sec
175.0
Floating-point performance
4,709 gflops
Length
10.5" (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
384-bit GDDR5
192 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
288.4 GB/s
448.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
G-SYNC support
+
VR Ready
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.5
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
7.5
CUDA cores
2688
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
243 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Blu Ray 3D
+
Check Price
Check Price
