GeForce GTX TITAN vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
When comparing GeForce GTX TITAN and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX TITAN and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX TITAN
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Power consumption (TDP)
250 Watt
200 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
One 8-pin and one 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX TITAN has 25% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
GeForce GTX TITAN is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX TITAN is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire - with GCN.
Core clock speed of Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is 13 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX TITAN.
GeForce GTX TITAN and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is 4794 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX TITAN.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
40−45
35−40
ultra / 1080p
27−30
24−27
QHD / 1440p
21−24
18−20
4K / 2160p
12−14
10−11
low / 720p
70−75
60−65
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
high / 1080p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
60−65
50−55
QHD / 1440p
45−50
35−40
4K / 2160p
24−27
18−20
low / 720p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
75−80
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
30−33
0−1
GeForce GTX TITAN and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
250−260
medium / 768p
230−240
220−230
ultra / 1080p
200−210
180−190
QHD / 1440p
150−160
110−120
4K / 2160p
100−110
70−75
high / 768p
220−230
210−220
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX TITAN and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
100−110
GeForce GTX TITAN and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p
55−60
45−50
ultra / 1080p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
35−40
30−33
4K / 2160p
18−20
16−18
low / 720p
90−95
85−90
medium / 1080p
60−65
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
high / 1080p
75−80
60−65
ultra / 1080p
60−65
50−55
QHD / 1440p
35−40
30−33
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
low / 720p
200−210
180−190
medium / 1080p
130−140
120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in Fortnite is 13% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
high / 1080p
75−80
60−65
ultra / 1080p
55−60
45−50
QHD / 1440p
40−45
30−35
4K / 2160p
30−33
24−27
low / 720p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
80−85
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
low / 768p
150−160
140−150
medium / 768p
140−150
130−140
high / 1080p
85−90
75−80
ultra / 1080p
40−45
30−35
QHD / 1440p
30−35
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in Grand Theft Auto V is 10% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
high / 1080p
30−35
24−27
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
21−24
18−20
4K / 2160p
12−14
9−10
low / 720p
80−85
70−75
medium / 1080p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
low / 768p
130−140
130−140
medium / 1080p
130−140
120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in Minecraft is 3% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
110−120
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
high / 1080p
30−35
24−27
ultra / 1080p
20−22
16−18
QHD / 1440p
14−16
10−12
4K / 2160p
10−11
8−9
low / 720p
80−85
70−75
medium / 1080p
45−50
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
low / 768p
160−170
130−140
medium / 768p
100−110
85−90
high / 1080p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
30−35
27−30
4K / 2160p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
60−65
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX TITAN in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX TITAN
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Architecture
Kepler
GCN
Code name
GK110
Neptune CF
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
19 February 2013
1 May 2012
Pipelines
2688
2560
Core clock speed
837 MHz
850 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
900 MHz
Transistor count
7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
187.5 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
4,709 gflops
Length
10.5" (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
384-bit GDDR5
2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
4800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
288.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
DirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
2688
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
243 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Blu Ray 3D
+
Check Price
Check Price