GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX TITAN Z and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX TITAN Z will be the best choice, for others Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
Power consumption (TDP)
375 Watt
60 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Two 8-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount
12 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX TITAN Z has 525% more power consumption, than Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z is used in Desktops, and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q - with Turing.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX TITAN Z is 105 MHz higher, than Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q is 13993 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX TITAN Z.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
40−45
40−45
ultra / 1080p
27−30
27−30
QHD / 1440p
21−24
21−24
4K / 2160p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
65−70
65−70
medium / 1080p
50−55
50−55
GeForce GTX TITAN Z and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
65−70
65−70
ultra / 1080p
55−60
60−65
QHD / 1440p
40−45
40−45
4K / 2160p
21−24
21−24
low / 720p
110−120
120−130
medium / 1080p
70−75
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX TITAN Z.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTX TITAN Z.
low / 768p
250−260
250−260
medium / 768p
220−230
230−240
ultra / 1080p
200−210
200−210
QHD / 1440p
130−140
140−150
4K / 2160p
90−95
95−100
high / 768p
210−220
220−230
The average gaming FPS of Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than GeForce GTX TITAN Z.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX TITAN Z and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
100−110
GeForce GTX TITAN Z and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p
50−55
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
30−35
35−40
4K / 2160p
18−20
18−20
low / 720p
90−95
90−95
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 1% more, than GeForce GTX TITAN Z.
high / 1080p
70−75
75−80
ultra / 1080p
55−60
55−60
QHD / 1440p
30−35
35−40
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
low / 720p
190−200
200−210
medium / 1080p
120−130
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q in Fortnite is 5% more, than GeForce GTX TITAN Z.
high / 1080p
70−75
70−75
ultra / 1080p
50−55
55−60
QHD / 1440p
35−40
40−45
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
low / 720p
110−120
120−130
medium / 1080p
75−80
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX TITAN Z.
low / 768p
150−160
150−160
medium / 768p
130−140
140−150
high / 1080p
80−85
85−90
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
QHD / 1440p
27−30
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than GeForce GTX TITAN Z.
high / 1080p
30−33
30−35
ultra / 1080p
24−27
24−27
QHD / 1440p
18−20
20−22
4K / 2160p
10−12
10−12
low / 720p
75−80
80−85
medium / 1080p
40−45
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 2% more, than GeForce GTX TITAN Z.
low / 768p
130−140
130−140
medium / 1080p
130−140
130−140
GeForce GTX TITAN Z and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
110−120
110−120
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
GeForce GTX TITAN Z and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
18−20
20−22
QHD / 1440p
14−16
14−16
4K / 2160p
9−10
10−11
low / 720p
75−80
80−85
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX TITAN Z.
low / 768p
150−160
150−160
medium / 768p
100−105
100−110
high / 1080p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
30−35
4K / 2160p
18−20
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1% more, than GeForce GTX TITAN Z.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
55−60
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GeForce GTX TITAN Z.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
Architecture
Kepler
Turing
Code name
GK110B
N19E-Q1 MAX-Q
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
28 May 2014
27 May 2019
Pipelines
2880
1920
Core clock speed
705 MHz
600 - 870 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1215 - 1380 MHz
Transistor count
7,080 million
10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
12 nm
Texture fill rate
338 billion/sec
175.0
Floating-point performance
2x 5,046 gflops
Length
10.5" (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
768-bit (384-bit per GPU)
192 Bit
Memory clock speed
7.0 GB/s
14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
672 GB/s
448.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
G-SYNC support
+
VR Ready
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.5
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
7.5
CUDA cores
5760
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
325 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Blu Ray 3D
+
Check Price
Check Price