FirePro W5100 vs GeForce MX110
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W5100 and GeForce MX110, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W5100 stacks up against GeForce MX110, check out specs charts below.
FirePro W5100
GeForce MX110 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX110 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX110 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W5100 | GeForce MX110 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5/DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W5100 has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce MX110.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W5100 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX110.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX110 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce MX110 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX110 is 35 MHz higher, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 and GeForce MX110 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 4200 MHz higher, than GeForce MX110.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 113% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W5100 and GeForce MX110 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 65% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 63% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 92% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 79% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 55% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 36% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5100 | GeForce MX110 | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Bonaire | N16V-GMR1 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 31 March 2014 | 1 January 2018 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 965 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 23.83 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 762.6 gflops |
| Length | 171 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / half length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |