GeForce MX110 vs GRID K280Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce MX110 and GRID K280Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce MX110 stacks up against GRID K280Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K280Q
GeForce MX110 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX110 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX110 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX110 | GRID K280Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5/DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 650% more power consumption, than GeForce MX110.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K280Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX110.
- GeForce MX110 is used in Laptops, and GRID K280Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX110 is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K280Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX110 is 220 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- GeForce MX110 and GRID K280Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce MX110.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce MX110 and GRID K280Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 40% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 77% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 51% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 61% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 83% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 53% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 21% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX110 | GRID K280Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N16V-GMR1 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 2018 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |