GeForce MX110 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
When choosing between GeForce MX110 and Radeon Pro Vega 16, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce MX110 and Radeon Pro Vega 16.
GeForce MX110 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce MX110 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX110 or Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX110
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)
30 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5/DDR3
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX110.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX110.
GeForce MX110 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce MX110 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
GeForce MX110 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 600 MHz higher, than GeForce MX110.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 222% more, than GeForce MX110.
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−11
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
24−27
75−80
medium / 1080p
12−14
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 213% more, than GeForce MX110.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX110.
low / 768p
130−140
240−250
medium / 768p
110−120
210−220
ultra / 1080p
50−55
130−140
QHD / 1440p
27−30
100−110
4K / 2160p
27−30
60−65
high / 768p
80−85
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 115% more, than GeForce MX110.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX110.
low / 768p
80−85
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−35
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 91% more, than GeForce MX110.
high / 1080p
8−9
30−33
ultra / 1080p
7−8
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
3−4
9−10
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 255% more, than GeForce MX110.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−11
30−33
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
low / 720p
60−65
130−140
medium / 1080p
21−24
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 162% more, than GeForce MX110.
high / 1080p
12−14
40−45
ultra / 1080p
10−12
30−35
QHD / 1440p
1−2
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 720p
24−27
75−80
medium / 1080p
14−16
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 230% more, than GeForce MX110.
low / 768p
50−55
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
high / 1080p
12−14
45−50
ultra / 1080p
6−7
20−22
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 148% more, than GeForce MX110.
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
6−7
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 316% more, than GeForce MX110.
low / 768p
95−100
120−130
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 26% more, than GeForce MX110.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 72% more, than GeForce MX110.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−12
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 180% more, than GeForce MX110.
low / 768p
24−27
85−90
medium / 768p
16−18
55−60
high / 1080p
9−10
30−33
ultra / 1080p
6−7
16−18
4K / 2160p
6−7
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 207% more, than GeForce MX110.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 38% more, than GeForce MX110.
Full Specs
GeForce MX110
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture
Maxwell
Vega
Code name
N16V-GMR1
Vega Mobile
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 January 2018
15 November 2018
Pipelines
256
1024
Core clock speed
965 MHz
Boost Clock
993 MHz
1190 MHz
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
23.83
76.16
Floating-point performance
762.6 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
40.1 GB/s
307.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
