GeForce MX110 vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between GeForce MX110 and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX110 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce MX110 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX110 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX110 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX110 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5/DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 650% more power consumption, than GeForce MX110.
- GeForce MX110 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce MX110.
- GeForce MX110 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX110 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX110 is 391 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce MX110 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1332 MHz higher, than GeForce MX110.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Fortnite is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 44% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX110 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | N16V-GMR1 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 January 2018 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 256 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |