FirePro S7000 vs GeForce MX130
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and GeForce MX130 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce MX130 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX130 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX130 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX130 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce MX130 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5, DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 1066% more power consumption, than GeForce MX130.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S7000 and GeForce MX130 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX130 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce MX130 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX130 is 172 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 and GeForce MX130 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX130 is 212 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 121% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 141% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 91% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 129% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 83% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 91% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 118% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce MX130. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce MX130 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Pitcairn | N16S-GTR |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 1 January 2018 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 1122 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 29.81 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 953.9 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |