FireStream 9270 vs GeForce MX130
When comparing FireStream 9270 and GeForce MX130, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce MX130 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9270
GeForce MX130 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX130 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX130 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce MX130 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5, DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 433% more power consumption, than GeForce MX130.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX130 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX130 has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX130 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce MX130 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX130 is 372 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce MX130 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX130 is 1412 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 71% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9270 and GeForce MX130 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Fortnite is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Minecraft is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 91% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce MX130 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
Code name | RV770 | N16S-GTR |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 1 January 2018 |
Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1122 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 29.81 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 953.9 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |