GeForce MX130 vs GRID K220Q
In this comparison between GeForce MX130 and GRID K220Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX130 will be the best choice, for others GRID K220Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K220Q
GeForce MX130 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX130 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX130 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX130 | GRID K220Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5, DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 650% more power consumption, than GeForce MX130.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K220Q has 508 GB more memory, than GeForce MX130.
- GeForce MX130 is used in Laptops, and GRID K220Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX130 is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX130 is 377 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GeForce MX130 and GRID K220Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX130 is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 180% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Battlefield 5 is 185% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Fortnite is 95% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Grand Theft Auto V is 87% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Minecraft is 40% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX130 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX130 | GRID K220Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N16S-GTR | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 2018 | 2 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.81 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |