GeForce MX130 vs GRID K520
When comparing GeForce MX130 and GRID K520, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX130 and GRID K520 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K520
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX130 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX130 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX130 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX130 | GRID K520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5, DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 650% more power consumption, than GeForce MX130.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce MX130 and GRID K520 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce MX130 is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX130 is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX130 is 377 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GeForce MX130 and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX130 is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 73% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce MX130 and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 55% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 76% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 22% more, than GeForce MX130. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX130 | GRID K520 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | N16S-GTR | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 January 2018 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.81 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |