GeForce MX130 vs Radeon Pro W5500M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce MX130 and Radeon Pro W5500M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce MX130 stacks up against Radeon Pro W5500M, check out specs charts below.
Radeon Pro W5500M
GeForce MX130 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX130 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX130 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX130 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5, DDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 183% more power consumption, than GeForce MX130.
- GeForce MX130 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce MX130 and Radeon Pro W5500M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce MX130 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX130 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- GeForce MX130 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 6988 MHz higher, than GeForce MX130.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 57% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce MX130 and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 24% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 58% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 41% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 52% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 12% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 30% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 41% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX130 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | N16S-GTR | Navi 14 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 2018 | 10 February 2020 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1408 |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | 1450 MHz |
| Transistor count | 6,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.81 | 127.6 |
| Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |