FirePro W5100 vs GeForce MX150
In this comparison between FirePro W5100 and GeForce MX150 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5100 will be the best choice, for others GeForce MX150 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W5100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce MX150 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 10 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W5100 has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W5100 and GeForce MX150 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX150 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce MX150 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 538 MHz higher, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 8 MHz higher, than FirePro W5100.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W5100 and GeForce MX150 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 31% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 26% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 44% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 5% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 14% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 13% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GeForce MX150. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce MX150 | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Bonaire | N17S-G1 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 16 May 2017 |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 24.91 |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 1,127 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R7 260X
- FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon R7 260X
- GeForce MX150 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- FirePro W5100 vs Iris Graphics 540
- FirePro W5100 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GeForce MX150 vs Iris Graphics 540
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000