FireStream 9370 vs GeForce MX150
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX150 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others GeForce MX150 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce MX150 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 10 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 2150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX150 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX150 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX150 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce MX150 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 643 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce MX150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 1408 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX150 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 6% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 4% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX150 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX150 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce MX150. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce MX150 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Pascal |
Code name | Cypress | N17S-G1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 16 May 2017 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 24.91 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 1,127 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- GeForce MX150 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- GeForce MX150 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Iris Graphics 540
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GeForce MX150 vs Iris Graphics 540
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000