GeForce GTX 275 vs GeForce MX150
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 275 and GeForce MX150, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 275 stacks up against GeForce MX150, check out specs charts below.
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 275
GeForce MX150
Power consumption (TDP)
219 Watt
10 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 275 has 2090% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
GeForce GTX 275 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX150 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 275 has 892 GB more memory, than GeForce MX150.
GeForce GTX 275 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX150 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce MX150 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 64 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce MX150 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 4874 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
16−18
24−27
medium / 1080p
8−9
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
10−12
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−11
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
24−27
40−45
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 275 and GeForce MX150 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
180−190
medium / 768p
100−110
150−160
ultra / 1080p
50−55
80−85
QHD / 1440p
27−30
45−50
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
75−80
120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
medium / 768p
55−60
80−85
ultra / 1080p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
8−9
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
4K / 2160p
3−4
5−6
low / 720p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Far Cry 5 is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
85−90
medium / 1080p
21−24
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
12−14
20−22
ultra / 1080p
10−12
16−18
QHD / 1440p
1−2
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
40−45
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
50−55
70−75
medium / 768p
45−50
65−70
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
4−5
7−8
ultra / 1080p
3−4
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
21−24
medium / 1080p
6−7
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Metro Exodus is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
95−100
medium / 1080p
90−95
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
16−18
20−22
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
10−12
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
24−27
40−45
medium / 768p
16−18
27−30
high / 1080p
9−10
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
medium / 768p
40−45
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
27−30
high / 768p
35−40
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 275
GeForce MX150
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Pascal
Code name
GT200B
N17S-G1
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
15 January 2009
16 May 2017
Pipelines
240
384
Core clock speed
1404 MHz
1468 MHz
Boost Clock
1532 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
50.6 billion/sec
24.91
Floating-point performance
673.9 gflops
1,127 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1134 MHz
6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
127.0 GB/s
40.1 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
3.0
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
6.1
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
