GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce MX150
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce MX150 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others GeForce MX150 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | GeForce MX150 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 10 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 1500% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX150 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX150 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX150 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce MX150 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 689 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce MX150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 2000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Battlefield 5 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce MX150 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | GeForce MX150 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | GF114 | N17S-G1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 16 May 2017 |
Pipelines | 336 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 24.91 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 1,127 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | 6.1 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce MX150 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce MX150 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Graphics 540
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GeForce MX150 vs Iris Graphics 540
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000