GeForce MX150 vs GRID K160Q
When comparing GeForce MX150 and GRID K160Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX150 and GRID K160Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K160Q
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX150 | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 1200% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce MX150 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce MX150 is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX150 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 618 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce MX150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID K160Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 4226 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Battlefield 5 is 575% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 182% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 81% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 833% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX150 | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | N17S-G1 | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 May 2017 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1468 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 3.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |