GeForce MX150 vs GRID K240Q
When comparing GeForce MX150 and GRID K240Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX150 and GRID K240Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K240Q
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX150 | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 2150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce MX150 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce MX150 is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX150 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 723 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce MX150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID K240Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 1008 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce MX150 and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| GeForce MX150 and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 2% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX150 | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | N17S-G1 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 May 2017 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1468 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 3.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |