GeForce MX150 vs GRID K520
In this comparison between GeForce MX150 and GRID K520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX150 will be the best choice, for others GRID K520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K520
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX150 | GRID K520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 2150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce MX150 and GRID K520 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce MX150 is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX150 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 723 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GeForce MX150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID K520 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 1008 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 40% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce MX150 and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 31% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 29% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX150 | GRID K520 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | N17S-G1 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 May 2017 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1468 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 3.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |