GeForce MX150 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
In this comparison between GeForce MX150 and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX150 will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce MX150 and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce MX150 and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 or Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX150
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
Power consumption (TDP)
10 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce MX150 is build with Pascal architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 1168 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
GeForce MX150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
9−10
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
21−24
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
high / 1080p
18−20
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce MX150 and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
180−190
160−170
medium / 768p
150−160
130−140
ultra / 1080p
80−85
65−70
QHD / 1440p
45−50
35−40
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
120−130
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
80−85
70−75
ultra / 1080p
50−55
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
high / 1080p
14−16
10−12
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
14−16
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
high / 1080p
21−24
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
85−90
70−75
medium / 1080p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
QHD / 1440p
6−7
3−4
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
medium / 768p
65−70
55−60
high / 1080p
21−24
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 19% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
high / 1080p
7−8
6−7
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−11
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
low / 768p
100−110
100−110
high / 1080p
−
95−100
ultra / 1080p
95−100
85−90
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
high / 1080p
20−22
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
40−45
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
16−18
medium / 1080p
14−16
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
low / 768p
40−45
30−35
medium / 768p
27−30
21−24
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
50−55
ultra / 1080p
27−30
24−27
high / 768p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
Full Specs
GeForce MX150
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
Architecture
Pascal
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
N17S-G1
Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
16 May 2017
28 May 2019
Pipelines
384
48
Core clock speed
1468 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1532 MHz
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
24.91
Floating-point performance
1,127 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
40.1 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
6.1
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
