GeForce MX150 vs Radeon R9 M270X
When comparing GeForce MX150 and Radeon R9 M270X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX150 and Radeon R9 M270X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M270X
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX150 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce MX150 and Radeon R9 M270X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce MX150 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX150 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 743 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- GeForce MX150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 4883 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce MX150 and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Far Cry 5 is 77% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 51% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Metro Exodus is 83% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX150 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N17S-G1 | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 16 May 2017 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1468 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | 775 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 31.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce MX150 vs Iris Graphics 540
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Graphics 540
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GeForce MX150 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370