GeForce MX150 vs Tesla C2070
When choosing between GeForce MX150 and Tesla C2070, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce MX150 and Tesla C2070.
Tesla C2070
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX150 | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 2280% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- GeForce MX150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX150.
- GeForce MX150 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX150 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 894 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce MX150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 3020 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 41% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 37% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 31% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 44% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce MX150. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX150 | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
Code name | N17S-G1 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 16 May 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1468 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 6.1 | 2.0 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce MX150 vs Iris Graphics 540
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Tesla C2070 vs Iris Graphics 540
- Tesla C2070 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GeForce MX150 vs GeForce GTX 590
- GeForce MX150 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost