GeForce MX150 vs Tesla C2075

In this comparison between GeForce MX150 and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX150 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:

Main Specs

  GeForce MX150 Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 247 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI
  Check Price Check Price
  • Tesla C2075 has 2370% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
  • GeForce MX150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
  • Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX150.
  • GeForce MX150 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
  • GeForce MX150 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
  • Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 894 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
  • GeForce MX150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 2876 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 12−14 16−18
ultra / 1080p 7−8 10−11
QHD / 1440p 1−2 4−5
low / 720p 24−27 35−40
medium / 1080p 14−16 21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce MX150.

Full Specs

  GeForce MX150 Tesla C2075
Architecture Pascal Fermi 2.0
Code name N17S-G1 GF110
Type Laptop Workstation
Release date 16 May 2017 25 July 2011
Pipelines 384 448
Core clock speed 1468 MHz 574 MHz
Boost Clock 1532 MHz
Transistor count 1,800 million 3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Texture fill rate 24.91 32.14
Floating-point performance 1,127 gflops 1,030.4 gflops
Length 248 mm
Memory bus width 64 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz 3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth 40.1 GB/s 150.3 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 6.4 5.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1.1
Vulkan 1.2.131 N/A
CUDA 6.1 2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 94 Mh/s
Laptop size large
  Check Price Check Price