GeForce MX150 vs Tesla M10
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce MX150 and Tesla M10, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce MX150 stacks up against Tesla M10, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M10
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX150 | Tesla M10 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 2150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M10 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce MX150.
- GeForce MX150 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX150 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 435 MHz higher, than Tesla M10.
- GeForce MX150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 808 MHz higher, than Tesla M10.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 39% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 52% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce MX150. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX150 | Tesla M10 | |
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Code name | N17S-G1 | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 16 May 2017 | 18 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1468 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | 1306 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 52.24 |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 6.1 | 5.0 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |