GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce MX230
When comparing GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce MX230, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce MX230 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce MX230 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX230 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX230 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | GeForce MX230 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 10 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 450% more power consumption, than GeForce MX230.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce MX230 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX230 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce MX230 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 891 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX230 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 2992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce MX230 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Fortnite is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | GeForce MX230 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
Code name | GK106 | N17S-G0 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 20 February 2019 |
Pipelines | 768 | 256 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 1519 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 25.31 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 48.06 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | + |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |