GeForce GTX 950A vs GeForce MX230
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 950A and GeForce MX230 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 950A will be the best choice, for others GeForce MX230 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 950A
GeForce MX230 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX230 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX230 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | GeForce MX230 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 10 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 950A has 650% more power consumption, than GeForce MX230.
- GeForce GTX 950A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GeForce MX230 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX230 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 950A.
- GeForce GTX 950A is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX230 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 950A is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce MX230 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 526 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950A.
- GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX230 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 4998 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 950A and GeForce MX230 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Dota 2 is 14% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Fortnite is 23% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 23% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in World of Tanks is 9% more, than GeForce MX230. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | GeForce MX230 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
Code name | GM107 | N17S-G0 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 20 February 2019 |
Pipelines | 640 | 256 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 1519 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 | 25.31 |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 32.03 GB/s | 48.06 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | + |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce MX230 vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce MX230 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 950A vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Quadro M520
- GeForce MX230 vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI
- GeForce MX230 vs Quadro M520