GeForce MX230 vs GRID K260Q
In this comparison between GeForce MX230 and GRID K260Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX230 will be the best choice, for others GRID K260Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K260Q
GeForce MX230 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX230 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX230 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX230 | GRID K260Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 2150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX230.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce MX230 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce MX230 is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX230 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 774 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce MX230 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID K260Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 2000 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 58% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce MX230 and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 28% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 58% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 41% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 47% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GeForce MX230. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX230 | GRID K260Q | |
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | N17S-G0 | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 20 February 2019 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 256 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1519 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.31 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |