GeForce MX230 vs GRID M10 8Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce MX230 and GRID M10 8Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce MX230 and GRID M10 8Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M10 8Q
GeForce MX230 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX230 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX230 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX230 | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 2150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX230.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID M10 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce MX230.
- GeForce MX230 is used in Laptops, and GRID M10 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX230 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID M10 8Q - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 486 MHz higher, than GRID M10 8Q.
- GeForce MX230 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID M10 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 1800 MHz higher, than GRID M10 8Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce MX230 and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 29% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 7% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 29% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX230 | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Code name | N17S-G0 | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 20 February 2019 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1519 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.31 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |