GeForce MX230 vs Radeon RX Vega 3

In this comparison between GeForce MX230 and Radeon RX Vega 3 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX230 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 3 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce MX230 and Radeon RX Vega 3 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce MX230 and Radeon RX Vega 3 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX230 or Radeon RX Vega 3 here:

Main Specs

  GeForce MX230 Radeon RX Vega 3
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Display Connectors No outputs
  Check Price Check Price
  • Both cards are used in Laptops.
  • GeForce MX230 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 3 - with Vega.
  • GeForce MX230 and Radeon RX Vega 3 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 9−10 2−3
ultra / 1080p 5−6 1−2
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 21−24 14−16
medium / 1080p 12−14 4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon RX Vega 3.

Full Specs

  GeForce MX230 Radeon RX Vega 3
Architecture Pascal Vega
Code name N17S-G0 Vega Raven Ridge
Type Laptop Laptop
Release date 20 February 2019 7 January 2018
Pipelines 256 192
Core clock speed 1519 MHz
Boost Clock 1531 MHz 1000 MHz
Transistor count 1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Texture fill rate 25.31
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 48.06 GB/s
Shared memory - -
DirectX 12 (12_1) DirectX 12_1
Shader Model 6.4
OpenGL 4.6
OpenCL 1.2
Vulkan 1.2.131
CUDA +
Laptop size medium sized
Optimus +
  Check Price Check Price