FirePro M4150 vs GeForce MX250
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4150 and GeForce MX250. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4150 and GeForce MX250. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro M4150
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce MX250 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce MX250 uses PCIe 3.0 x4 interface.
- GeForce MX250 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX250 - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce MX250 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 803 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX250 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 3000 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 143% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−105 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 23% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce MX250 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Opal | N17S-G2 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 20 February 2019 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 1518 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 24.91 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 48.06 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |